[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stylesheet structure
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: stylesheet structure |
Date: |
Wed, 15 May 2013 12:34:14 +0200 |
Am Mittwoch, den 15.05.2013, 06:03 -0400 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Urs,
>
> > I don't know if it's the _best_ and _most flexible_ structure, but it
> > definitely looks like a _good_ and _flexible_ structure.
>
> I probably can't ask for any more at this stage. ;)
Exactly.
You should take that as a "yes, but I won't take any responsibility"
answer ;-)
>
> > (Just one question: Why is 6. named as it is?)
>
> Good question. I guess I'm thinking of a situation where one wants to restyle
> a certain piece of 'piano' (the "top level") music:
>
> Berceuse_Henle_concert.ly
> \include Berceuse_notes.ily
> \include piano_Henle_concert.ily
>
> Berceuse_Barenreiter_letter_landscape.ly
> \include Berceuse_notes.ily
> \include piano_Barenreiter_letter_landscape.ily
>
> Somehow that hierarchy seemed more logical. Thoughts?
Does that mean "concert" represents a paper format? Then it is clear.
Otherwise I'd still not understand the naming scheme.
Urs
>
> Thanks,
> Kieren.
>