Re: Creates more possibilities for vertical and horizontal skyline functions. (issue 7516048)

[address@hidden]

On 19 mars 2013, at 12:49, address@hidden wrote:

> Mike,
> 
> i've read the patch 3 times and i don't understand how it solves the
> problem.
> 
> I see that you remove some weird c++ code, but why can you do this?
> Also, why marking some grobs as cross-staff helps with solving issue
> 3242, which is about manual beams over rests?
> What figured bass has to do with this at all?
> 
>> Creates more possibilities for vertical and horizontal skyline
> functions.
> 
> I think this sentence applied to first version of the patch; it seems
> unrelated to current patchset.
> 
> I'm sorry to say this, but i think this issue is unreviewable :/

Thanks for the feedback!  I've changed the message on Rietveld to be more in 
line with the current patch - you're right that it's bounced around quite a 
bit.  I've also added a couple comments.

Cheers,
MS