Re: bar line interface / repat structure considerations

[Marc Hohl]

Am 13.03.2013 10:09, schrieb Marc Hohl:
> [...]
>
> a) replace the current mechanism by a command
> (define-bar-line <shortcut>
> (<bar-glyph> :prebreak <prebreak-glyph>
> :postbreak <postbreak-glyph>
> :span-bar <span-glyph>
> :prebreak-span <pre-span>
> :postbreak-span <post-span>))
>
> where :prebreak, :postbreak, :spanbar, :prebreak-span and :postbreak-span
> arguments are optional,and we define (in quasi-Lua syntax :-)
>
> <prebreak-glyph> = <prebreak-glyph> or <bar-glyph>
> <postbreak-glyph> = <postbreak-glyph> or #f
>
> <span-glyph> = <span-glyph> or <bar-glyph>
> <pre-span> = <pre-span> or <prebreak-glyph>
> <post-span> = <post-span> or 
> <postbreak-glyph>:postbreak-:post::postbreak-span postbreak-span 
> break-span span
Sorry, my email client inserted stuff here I didn't intend to write:

<span-glyph> = <span-glyph> or <bar-glyph>
<pre-span> = <pre-span> or <prebreak-glyph>
<post-span> = <post-span> or <postbreak-glyph>

And somethines thunderbird seems to eat spaces; they appear in the 
composer window,
but not in the final mail ... strange.

Marc