[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
GUB usage
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
GUB usage |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:10:38 -0500 |
For Octave, I'm trying to update GUB to use a newer gcc, and I'm
running across a few problems.
I haven't done much, but here is my clone of the repo:
http://hg.octave.org/gub
So now I need to patch the gcc sources because they have a small bug
that prevents building, and here I am puzzled about the overall GUB
architecture. Why is the patching logic spread out between actual
patch files and Python spec files? For my current issue, I need to
figure out this problem:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2013-03/msg00041.html
so for this I would write a patch file, right? Or should I put the
patch logic in Python source code and use the file_sub() function?
Is there a simple mechanism in GUB for writing these patch files?
Reading them, it looks like they were somehow automated, so I would
like to know how they were generated.
Finally, if I update the style of the Python to follow PEP 8 (e.g. no
long lines), would you accept back those patches?
- Jordi G. H.
- GUB usage,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=