|
From: | Trevor Daniels |
Subject: | Re: Substitute for s1*0 |
Date: | Mon, 7 May 2012 09:53:27 +0100 |
James wrote Monday, May 07, 2012 9:11 AM
Also isn't this a really a GLISS topic?
No. You miss the point: we're not talking about somethingnew: <> has been valid syntax for years, but its semantics are not documented. They should be.
Trevor
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |