Re: Implicit nonsense

[Trevor Daniels]

David Kastrup wrote Tuesday, January 31, 2012 2:31 PM


> "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > No, me neither, but leaving Voice contexts to be implied usually works
> > well, eg with Staff rather than StaffGroup.
>
> Why would you want to have the above end up in _two_ different voices?
> If you write
>
> \new Staff { \relative c' { \relative c' { c2~ } c } }
>
> the tie just disappears.  So I can't say this works well with "Staff
> rather than StaffGroup".

"usually".  You wouldn't usually have nested \relative's.

Implicit contexts are important for getting newbies off the ground.
But I agree the implementation is deficient.

Trevor