[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Update lilygit.tcl (Issue 2092) (issue 5504092)
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Update lilygit.tcl (Issue 2092) (issue 5504092) |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:39:37 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 |
On 1/21/12 5:36 PM, "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> wrote:
>2012/1/21 James <address@hidden>:
>> Hello
>>
>> On 21 January 2012 21:12, <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Some questions and concerns.
>>
>> While I don't understand any of this really, isn't lily-git.tcl
>> supposed to be for git-idiots (like me) who don't even want to think
>> about branches? :)
>
>That's exactly why they should work themselves, not needing you to fix
>them when they fail :)
>Being "fool-proof" requires extra tricks sometimes, hidden under the hood.
And I believe the current patch *is* foolproof.
Have you found an error? If so, can you demonstrate what you have done to
reproduce the error?
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: Update lilygit.tcl (Issue 2092) (issue 5504092), graham, 2012/01/14
- Re: Update lilygit.tcl (Issue 2092) (issue 5504092), graham, 2012/01/14
- Re: Update lilygit.tcl (Issue 2092) (issue 5504092), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2012/01/14
- Re: Update lilygit.tcl (Issue 2092) (issue 5504092), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2012/01/16
- Re: Update lilygit.tcl (Issue 2092) (issue 5504092), graham, 2012/01/20
- Re: Update lilygit.tcl (Issue 2092) (issue 5504092), janek . lilypond, 2012/01/21
- Re: Update lilygit.tcl (Issue 2092) (issue 5504092), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2012/01/21