Re: Further work on reducing make doc output - GOP 9

[Colin Campbell]

On 12-01-15 07:47 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> <snipped>
>
> OK - so I don't think anyone has looked at this.  I think I've got 3 
> options: ask again here; make a patch from the test files I created, 
> make a new directory in my lilypond-git directory and put them up, 
> standalone, as a patch on Rietveld for review; or implement this 
> system on the make doc build system and put the patch for review.  I'm 
> pretty much against the last one, owing to the chances of wasted 
> time.  Could anyone advise on the first 2 options?
>
> --
> Phil Holmes


It would seem reasonable to develop the test against your local doc 
build, then put up a patch on Rietveld for review, and possibly a 
Tracker item, as I can't quickly find an open one which would cover 
this.   I suggest that because patches in the formal process seem to 
have a better chance of review, although not a guarantee.

Regarding your scripts: can they be modified to accept a variable paper 
size, for those of us outside the A4 realm?

Cheers,
Colin

--
I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both 
hands.
You need to be able to throw something back.
-Maya Angelou, poet (1928- )