[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056)
From: |
janek . lilypond |
Subject: |
Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056) |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:23:29 +0000 |
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1350
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1350: partial measure @emph{before}
the start of the next full measure.
What about
"where @address@hidden is the duration that will be added before
the first measure. In other words, it is the @emph{remaining} length of
the partial measure @emph{before} the start of the first full measure."
?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1353
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1353: \time 6/8
On 2012/01/09 05:08:58, Graham Percival wrote:
huh?! why is this easier to understand than \partial 4 ?
+1
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1355
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1355: e8 | a4 c8 b[ c b] |
On 2012/01/09 05:08:58, Graham Percival wrote:
what on earth does manual beaming have to do with a \partial? How
does that
improve this example?
+1
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1358
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1358: The partial @var{duration}
can be any value less than a full measure:
I'm not sure about "partial duration" thing.
But i like the "value" part.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1363
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1363: r4 e8 | a4 c8 b[ c b] |
i think original example was better because it showed use of 8*3
construct.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/
- Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), pkx166h, 2012/01/06
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), graham, 2012/01/09
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), n . puttock, 2012/01/09
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), n . puttock, 2012/01/09
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), n . puttock, 2012/01/09
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056),
janek . lilypond <=
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), pkx166h, 2012/01/24
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), graham, 2012/01/24
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), janek . lilypond, 2012/01/24
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), pkx166h, 2012/01/29
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), graham, 2012/01/30