[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056)
From: |
graham |
Subject: |
Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056) |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jan 2012 05:08:58 +0000 |
I like some of the changes here, but I have serious doubts about others.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1353
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1353: \time 6/8
huh?! why is this easier to understand than \partial 4 ?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1355
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1355: e8 | a4 c8 b[ c b] |
what on earth does manual beaming have to do with a \partial? How does
that improve this example?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1366
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1366: The @code{\partial
@var{duration}} can also be written as;
if this was true, then surely there would be no difference between
\partial and \set blah after the piece had begun. However, the
@knownissues claims that you should only use \partial in the beginning.
I think in this case the original material was slightly less misleading.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/
- Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), pkx166h, 2012/01/06
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056),
graham <=
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), n . puttock, 2012/01/09
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), n . puttock, 2012/01/09
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), n . puttock, 2012/01/09
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), janek . lilypond, 2012/01/10
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), pkx166h, 2012/01/24
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), graham, 2012/01/24
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), janek . lilypond, 2012/01/24
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), pkx166h, 2012/01/29
- Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056), graham, 2012/01/30