[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:40:16 +0100 |
On 30 October 2010 08:39, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
> Would it be sufficient to handle SCM_UNDEFINED in
> type_check_assignment?
I don't think so. Unlike SCM_EOL or SCM_BOOL_F it doesn't have an
analogue in Scheme code.
> Or is there a deeper problem?
I think so. Perhaps there's a callback returning SCM_UNDEFINED by
mistake or forgetting to change an undefined default to something
sane.
Cheers,
Neil
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, (continued)
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/28
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, James Lowe, 2010/10/28
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, Carl Sorensen, 2010/10/28
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/28
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, Carl Sorensen, 2010/10/28
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, Carl Sorensen, 2010/10/28
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, Carl Sorensen, 2010/10/28
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/29
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, Neil Puttock, 2010/10/29
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/30
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/30
- Re: (tuplet . around) causes regtests to fail to compile, Neil Puttock, 2010/10/30