[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilymidi and lilysong
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: lilymidi and lilysong |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:28:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:05:38PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Do we still want to ship the lilysong and lilymidi scripts? I'm not
> sure if these still work, and there's hardly any documentation
> whatsoever.
...
> distribution packagers will keep cluttering the users' /usr/bin
> directory with unnecessary executable files.
They don't seem to be installed as part of the -x86 tarball, at
least. Now, you might wonder about abc2ly, and certainly etf2ly
and mup2ly, but I don't see any lilysong or lilymidi.
My thought is to get the somewhat-stable 2.14.0 out there, and
_then_ start removing the probably-broken etf2ly and mup2ly.
Mostly because I really, really, really don't want to start
changing our makefiles and GUB stuff if there's any chance of it
blowing up in my face.
Cheers,
- Graham