[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CG addition about Git pulling
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: CG addition about Git pulling |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:15:10 +0100 |
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 à 23:02 +0000, Trevor Daniels a écrit :
> Why not qualify each of these generic words? Like
> Graham did with "Summary of contributing"?
I second this for node names; as for section titles, they needn't be
unique, so we could use the same title 'Introduction' for each of these
sections.
Best,
John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, (continued)
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/05
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Graham Percival, 2010/01/05
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/05
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/06
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/06
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Graham Percival, 2010/01/08
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/08
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Graham Percival, 2010/01/08
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/09
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/08
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling,
John Mandereau <=
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Graham Percival, 2010/01/10