[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CG addition about Git pulling
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: CG addition about Git pulling |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:15:18 -0800 (PST) |
Graham Percival wrote:
> ***snip "do we actually want a separate 'For unix
> developers' " discussion about the new CG 1 introduction
> ***
>
> I'm not happy with the current layout in having it as a
> node. If we have it at all, I'd suggest a small bit at
> the top of the "for other contributors" section. Mark,
> what do you think about this patch?
I think it's better; what about you, Trevor?
Some other thoughts:
1) Do we really need intro fluff before every chapter TOC?
2) I don't like the word "Summary", but we've already used
"Introduction" and "Overview", both of which are better
words for what that section really is. Off the top of
my head, I can't think of anything else though.
- Mark
- CG addition about Git pulling, John Mandereau, 2010/01/04
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/05
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/05
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Graham Percival, 2010/01/05
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/05
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/06
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/06
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Graham Percival, 2010/01/08
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling,
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Graham Percival, 2010/01/08
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/09
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/08
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, John Mandereau, 2010/01/10
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Graham Percival, 2010/01/10