[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: G clef changes
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: G clef changes |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Jan 2010 04:33:44 -0200 |
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Valentin Villenave
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:49 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Don't load this as a picture into firefox on X11. It is something like
>> 10000x10000 pixels, and apparently firefox allocates a full-size
>> display-depth pixmap for that, making the server swallow more than 1.2G
>> of memory.
>> I managed to kill the firefox process by now. It was not pretty.
>
> I had a look without any problem (well, perhaps having a 64-bit CPU
> with lots of memory helps in this regard :-).
>
> Carl, Marc, how would that affect the regtests-checking process? When
> applying this patch all outputted PNGs will look different than
> before, so isn't there a risk that some actual regressions go
> unnoticed?
The regression comparison is not generated from the .PNG files, but
rather from the Stencil bounding boxes at the end of the formatting
process. I suspect that the change does not affect the clef's
bounding box.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font], Marc Hohl, 2010/01/01
- Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font], Carl Sorensen, 2010/01/01
- Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font], Marc Hohl, 2010/01/01
- Re: G clef changes, David Kastrup, 2010/01/01
- Re: G clef changes, Valentin Villenave, 2010/01/02
- Re: G clef changes, David Kastrup, 2010/01/02
- Re: G clef changes, Graham Percival, 2010/01/02
- Re: G clef changes,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: G clef changes, Marc Hohl, 2010/01/03
- Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font], Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/01/01
- Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font], Carl Sorensen, 2010/01/01
- Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font], Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/01/01