[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: G clef changes
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: G clef changes |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 12:01:42 +0100 |
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:49 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Don't load this as a picture into firefox on X11. It is something like
> 10000x10000 pixels, and apparently firefox allocates a full-size
> display-depth pixmap for that, making the server swallow more than 1.2G
> of memory.
> I managed to kill the firefox process by now. It was not pretty.
I had a look without any problem (well, perhaps having a 64-bit CPU
with lots of memory helps in this regard :-).
Carl, Marc, how would that affect the regtests-checking process? When
applying this patch all outputted PNGs will look different than
before, so isn't there a risk that some actual regressions go
unnoticed?
Cheers,
Valentin
- Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font], Marc Hohl, 2010/01/01
- Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font], Carl Sorensen, 2010/01/01
- Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font], Marc Hohl, 2010/01/01
- Re: G clef changes, David Kastrup, 2010/01/01
- Re: G clef changes,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: G clef changes, David Kastrup, 2010/01/02
- Re: G clef changes, Graham Percival, 2010/01/02
- Re: G clef changes, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/01/03
- Re: G clef changes, Marc Hohl, 2010/01/03
- Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font], Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/01/01
- Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font], Carl Sorensen, 2010/01/01
- Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font], Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/01/01