lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?


From: Reinhold Kainhofer
Subject: Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:09:56 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.28-14-generic; KDE/4.2.4; i686; ; )

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Freitag, 14. August 2009 06:54:45 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
> >> FWIW, I used to think that this would be a very important feature;
> >> now I'm not so sure. There are certainly a few cases (eg. slurs,
> >> hairpins, treble clefs) where having more accurate outlines would
> >> help.
> >
> > It would also help in improved positioning of accidentals.
> >
> >> But the list is fairly short: for most glyphs, a more accurate
> >> box wouldn't matter much.

One character where I have run into problems because of a too large bbox is 
the f dynamics sign. The upper left corner is empty, yet the bounding box 
claims it as part of the f, so everything else will be positioned too far away 
if the right edge happens to overlap a little bit with the left edge of the 
f...
Cheers,
Reinhold

- -- 
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
 * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKhVQUTqjEwhXvPN0RAsuYAKCxoZA/3UmmVrpyogqJpsCR3PJamACgmgG6
FKBQnAsD+O7mkn2j7xg9hyM=
=qh0/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]