[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: does ancient music work correctly?
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: does ancient music work correctly? |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Aug 2009 10:25:12 -0700 (PDT) |
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> ... (Ancient notation), I see that the very last note clashes
> with the final double barline. Additionally, if I change the
> \paper section from ... ragged-right=##t ... to ...
> line-width=15\cm ... I see that the \finalis double line is two
> times positioned *before* the preceding note...
I think this is due to the kludgy extra-X-extent overrides in the
divisiones command definitions:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blob;f=ly/gregorian.ly#l88
Joe, could you take a look at this?
Actually, I was looking at this file about a month ago, and I
noticed another problem. I'm surprised to see that I didn't report
it.
\break doesn't always work where you'd expect; this is because the
divisiones are breath marks not barlines. So doing "\finalis
\break" doesn't always work. In fact, the VaticanaVoice context
defaults to 4/4 time-signature, even though this is meaningless in
Gregorian Chant. So "\finalis \break" will only work if it happens
to land at a integer-value moment. I used this workaround:
ancientBreak = { \bar "" \break }
Surely there's a better solution, but I don't know it.
- Mark