[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: building sections of the docs
From: |
Paul Scott |
Subject: |
Re: building sections of the docs |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:25:59 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080103) |
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:17:31 -0700
Paul Scott <address@hidden> wrote:
John Mandereau wrote:
Can I build just pitches.itely portion of the doc's? If so how?
No, but you can build/clean only stuff in Documentation/user (or any
directory with docs) with these (mostly undocumented) incantations:
I'm following instructions at:
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/advanced-tech.txt
I'm trying to build to see the relationship between the source (.itely)
and the actual doc. I'm very visual. I don't necessarily need WYSIWYG
but I like seeing the output at some point. I haven't made any changes
for the above reason. Is a commit necessary to be able to build?
My favored command is:
cd Documentation/user/
make web
It gives the same failure. I see that there is a config.make.in but not
a config.make in the top directory.
I think this is translated into "make out-www www" or something
like that, but "make web" is simpler. :)
When I am in Documentation/user the above makes give me:
address@hidden:~/lily/doc/Documentation/user$ make out=www local-WWW
../../make/stepmake.make:69: ../../config.make: No such file or
directory ../../make/toplevel-version.make:6: /VERSION: No such file
or directory
Where did you get the sources from? I mean, is there a VERSION
file in the top level?
Yes.
I may be able to track this down but there's probably someone who
recognizes the problem.
Paul
- building sections of the docs, Paul Scott, 2008/01/06
- Re: building sections of the docs, John Mandereau, 2008/01/06
- Re: building sections of the docs, Paul Scott, 2008/01/06
- Re: building sections of the docs, Graham Percival, 2008/01/06
- Re: building sections of the docs,
Paul Scott <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: building sections of the docs, Paul Scott, 2008/01/06
- Re: building sections of the docs, Graham Percival, 2008/01/06
- Re: building sections of the docs, Paul Scott, 2008/01/07
- Re: building sections of the docs, Graham Percival, 2008/01/07
- Re: building sections of the docs, Paul Scott, 2008/01/07