[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git patch
From: |
Johannes Schindelin |
Subject: |
Re: git patch |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Dec 2006 11:49:35 +0100 (CET) |
Hi,
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> I'm not saying git-diff should be inconvenient, but rather that it gives
> a newbie more confidence if
>
> git commit --dry
>
> shows the diff of the change that he just introduced
Okay. But you mean
$ git commit --dry file1 file2...
or
$ git commit --dry -a
Or, you use the script git-hunk-commit.bash which I posted. Which reminds
me: I wanted to rewrite it for you so it is more non-brand-new-bash
friendly.
Ciao,
Dscho
- Re: git patch, (continued)
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/05
- Re: git patch, Graham Percival, 2006/12/05
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/05
- Re: git patch, Graham Percival, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch,
Johannes Schindelin <=
- Re: git patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Jakub Narebski, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/06
Re: git patch, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/12/05
Re: git patch, John Mandereau, 2006/12/05