[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git patch
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: git patch |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:52:51 +0100 (CET) |
> cvs co blah blah (which I simply copy and paste from savannah anyway)
> while (true) {
> cvs update // get changes that happened overnight
> vi foo/bar/baz.txt // or whatever editing commands you do
> make; make web // or whatever testing commands you do
> cvs update // get latest changes to prepare for
> // uploading changes. This step may or
> // may not be required in git.
> cvs ci foo/bar/baz.txt // upload changes
> }
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes!
It took me a while to realize that a git repository, as soon as you've
cloned it, is *self-contained*, and that commiting to the repository
and synchronizing with a different git repository are two completely
different things (contrary to CVS). This should be pronounced more in
the CVS->git guide.
Werner
- Re: git patch, (continued)
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Jakub Narebski, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch,
Werner LEMBERG <=
Re: git patch, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/12/05
Re: git patch, John Mandereau, 2006/12/05