[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CygWin woes
From: |
Max Bowsher |
Subject: |
Re: CygWin woes |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Apr 2003 01:02:02 +0100 |
Charles Wilson wrote:
> Earnie Boyd wrote:
>
>> Magnus Therning wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> int
>>> foo(int bar)
>>> {
>>> return 42 * bar;
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> FWIW, if you wish to export this function from the dll then you should
>> prototype it as ``__declspec(dllexport) int foo (int);'' so that the
>> linker doesn't have to guess.
>
> Disagree 100%. The whole point of my work and that of others over the
> last 2.5 years concerning auto-import in gcc, binutils, automake,
> autoconf, and libtool was precisely so that -- on cygwin at least, if
> not on mingw -- we can discard those damn declspec() atrocities. PLEASE
> don't encourage cygwin users to go back to the dark ages...
Yep. I'm guessing the all he needs to do is use the -no-undefined flag. (See
demo subdir of libtool for example).
Max.