[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CygWin woes
From: |
Max Bowsher |
Subject: |
Re: CygWin woes |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:08:18 +0100 |
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Libtool 1.5 (released just a day ago) has no problems that I am aware
> of with building DLLs under Cygwin. However, any libraries that your
> library depends on must also be built as a DLL, and some key Cygwin
> libraries (e.g. libstdc++ and libXt) are not delivered as DLLs.
>From the Cygwin libtool-1.5-1 release notes:
o Skips the "DLLs may only depend on other DLLs" check when the
dependency is one of the "standard" runtime libs which are currently
available only in static form (libgcc.a, libstdc++.a, etc) on
cygwin/mingw.
But I don't think libXt is considered sufficiently "standard" to be included
in this.
> I strongly recommend upgrading to 1.5. Hopefully it will become
> Cygwin "standard" soon, if not already.
Its already on the master site, although not all the mirrors have caught up
yet.
Max.
- CygWin woes, Magnus Therning, 2003/04/17
- Re: CygWin woes, Magnus Therning, 2003/04/23
- Re: CygWin woes, Earnie Boyd, 2003/04/24
- Re: CygWin woes, Charles Wilson, 2003/04/24
- Re: CygWin woes, Max Bowsher, 2003/04/24
- Re: CygWin woes, Earnie Boyd, 2003/04/24
- Re: CygWin woes, Max Bowsher, 2003/04/24
- Re: CygWin woes, Charles Wilson, 2003/04/24