[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flat namespaces redux
From: |
F J Franklin |
Subject: |
Re: flat namespaces redux |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:50:56 +0000 (GMT) |
The "-flat_namespace -undefined suppress" can be a severe pain. I usually
avoid these flags by adding -no-undefined to LDFLAGS, but this can cause
havoc with some packages. Trying to compile GTK-2.0 when -no-undefined has
been added everywhere is fun fun fun
Perhaps we just have to accept that Darwin is different?
Still, -Xlinker has proven to very useful. You can do fun stuff like
libThing_la_LDFLAGS = -no-undefined \
-Xlinker -prebind -Xlinker -seg1addr -Xlinker 3f00f000
Viva la dyld,
Frank
ps. While the world's need for two-level namespaces may be questionable,
MacOSX nevertheless makes considerable use of the feature...
Francis James Franklin
address@hidden
`Medium atomic weights are available: Gold, Lead, Copper, Jet, Diamond,
Radium, Sapphire, Silver and Steel.
`Sapphire and Steel have been assigned...'
- Re: flat namespaces redux, (continued)
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Benjamin Reed, 2003/02/03
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Peter O'Gorman, 2003/02/03
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Albert Chin, 2003/02/03
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Robert Boehne, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Yves de Champlain, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Albert Chin, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Robert Boehne, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Albert Chin, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Robert Boehne, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Benjamin Reed, 2003/02/06
Re: flat namespaces redux,
F J Franklin <=