[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments* |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:46:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hi Peter,
I answered already in another mail, but since replying to several mails
at once is not always easy to spot:
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:29:20PM CET:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> >Ah yes. Thinko. Currently we should recommend:
> >
> > ../configure CC='/opt/pgcc-78.9/bin/pgcc -foo-option'
> >
> >But, I agree that supporting multiple compilers in users' PATH is also
> >a nice feature. Like you said, "let's do both!" :-) We'll need an
> >entry in sh.test to spot switches missing the '*' inside 'case
> >$cc_basename'
> >to save us forgetting in the future as part of the patch too.
>
> Hi all,
> I'm confused as to whether all this means that my original patch is
> acceptable or not :)
Yes, your original patch is acceptable, but not enough. Please apply.
Thanks,
Ralf
- Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/03/01
- Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/03/01
- Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*, Peter O'Gorman, 2005/03/02
- Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/03/02
- Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/03/02
- Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*, Alexandre Oliva, 2005/03/02
- Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*, Albert Chin, 2005/03/02