libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:46:06 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Hi Peter,

I answered already in another mail, but since replying to several mails
at once is not always easy to spot:

* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:29:20PM CET:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> 
> >Ah yes.  Thinko.  Currently we should recommend:
> >
> >  ../configure CC='/opt/pgcc-78.9/bin/pgcc -foo-option'
> >
> >But, I agree that supporting multiple compilers in users' PATH is also
> >a nice feature.  Like you said, "let's do both!" :-)  We'll need an
> >entry in sh.test to spot switches missing the '*' inside 'case 
> >$cc_basename'
> >to save us forgetting in the future as part of the patch too.
> 
> Hi all,
> I'm confused as to whether all this means that my original patch is 
> acceptable or not :)

Yes, your original patch is acceptable, but not enough.  Please apply.

Thanks,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]