[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rpath bug
From: |
Scott James Remnant |
Subject: |
Re: rpath bug |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 11:56:41 +0000 |
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 20:28 -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >
> > I will be leaving the country and without net access until the new year,
> > so I think a 2004 release is out of the question now anyway :-(
>
> Unless another capable maintainer steps up to the plate. As I recall,
> Peter O'Gorman has cut several releases. We can cut the release as
> soon as the code is ready.
>
I can always make a 2.0 release -- have made a couple of the 1.5 ones;
though I'd certainly like to see the subdirectory bugs fixed first :)
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- rpath bug, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/27
- Re: rpath bug, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/27
- Re: rpath bug, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/27
- Re: rpath bug, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/27
- Re: rpath bug, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/27
- Re: rpath bug, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/27
- Re: rpath bug, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/28
- releasing 2.0 (was Re: rpath bug), Peter O'Gorman, 2004/11/28
- Re: releasing 2.0 (was Re: rpath bug), Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/28
- Re: releasing 2.0 (was Re: rpath bug), Peter O'Gorman, 2004/11/28
- Re: rpath bug,
Scott James Remnant <=
- Re: rpath bug, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/27