[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rpath bug
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: rpath bug |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:08:09 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Macintosh/20041103) |
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Development libtool is simply incompatible with the significant
functionality which has been added to Automake in the past couple of
years.
:-(
At least you caught it before we released it into the wild...
I continue to believe that we should fix these subdirectory-related
issues before 2.0 is released. It is likely that not many changes will
be required, but determining the right changes to make could be painful.
Agreed. Releasing with known bugs seems like it will cause more work
than fixing them first!
I will be leaving the country and without net access until the new year,
so I think a 2004 release is out of the question now anyway :-(
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- rpath bug, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/27
- Re: rpath bug, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/27
- Re: rpath bug, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/27
- Re: rpath bug, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/27
- Re: rpath bug,
Gary V. Vaughan <=
- Re: rpath bug, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/27
- Re: rpath bug, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/28
- releasing 2.0 (was Re: rpath bug), Peter O'Gorman, 2004/11/28
- Re: releasing 2.0 (was Re: rpath bug), Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/28
- Re: releasing 2.0 (was Re: rpath bug), Peter O'Gorman, 2004/11/28
- Re: rpath bug, Scott James Remnant, 2004/11/28
- Re: rpath bug, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/27