Re: libtool-1.5.10.ldsoinclude.patch

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Daniel Reed wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:36:37PM CET:
> On 2004-11-17T09:13+0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> ) * Daniel Reed wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:56:53AM CET:
> ) > I am told that /etc/ld.so.conf's format is considered an
> ) > implementation detail by glibc developers, and that no format will be
> ) > guaranteed. If Libtool is to continue parsing ld.so.conf, it will have
> ) > to be with the understanding that the file format can continue to be a
> ) > moving target.

I have still committed your patch -- it's an improvement over what we
had before (namely, bogus information in sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec).

Let's discuss the general answer to this problem in light of your RFC on
libtool (might take some time though).

Regards,
Ralf