libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1.5] testsuite failures: missing AM_PROG_CC_C_O


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1.5] testsuite failures: missing AM_PROG_CC_C_O
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:16:32 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Hi Gary,

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 08:36:57PM CEST:
> 
> Please update to automake HEAD!

I have!  I had before!

> On 9 Sep 2004, at 15:21, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> >Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >>Some of the tests in the branch-1-5 testsuite fail with recent CVS
> >>Automake, because they have objects with per-target flags which are
> >>not Libtool objects.  A current Automake complains, which makes
> >>several tests fail.  The trivial patch below fixes this.
> >
> >Well, it seems unlikely that there will be any more releases on 
> >branch-1-5, but applied this anyway :)
> 
> Please revert, now that Alexandre is back from vacation, he has fixed
> CVS automake.  No sense in adding random cruft to the libtool
> configury just to support a small range of unreleased CVS revisions of
> automake.

Well.  I'm sorry for being less verbose in my bug report, and for not
looking enough at which program's fault this is.  But: CVS HEAD Automake
still fails on the files libtool-1.5/{demo,pdemo}/Makefile.am with

| Makefile.am: C objects with per-target flags but `AM_PROG_CC_C_O' not in 
`configure.ac'

So then this must be a bug in Automake, right?

Regards,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]