[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: must "cvs update" before "cvs commit", why??

From: Mike Castle
Subject: Re: must "cvs update" before "cvs commit", why??
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:22:19 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.6i

On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:26:34AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> This is really strange: often some changed files won't be committed
> unless I perform a general "cvs update" (where this changed files appear
> as M). After the update the "cvs commit" works fine. And FWIW I am the
> only committer on this repository.

You may be the only committer, but are you committing from only one checked
out tree?  Or did you do anything unusual on the checkout or update?

       Mike Castle       Life is like a clock:  You can work constantly
  address@hidden  and be right all the time, or not work at all and be right at least twice a day.  -- mrc
    We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan.  -- Watchmen

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]