[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: must "cvs update" before "cvs commit", why??

From: Mike Castle
Subject: Re: must "cvs update" before "cvs commit", why??
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:46:20 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.6i

On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:29:17PM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 08:22:19AM -0500, Mike Castle wrote:
> > You may be the only committer, but are you committing from only one checked
> > out tree?  Or did you do anything unusual on the checkout or update?
> Always from the same checked-out tree and nothing unusual with the
> commit or update.

What OS and environment?  Would clocks being out of sync, or changing
somewhere along the line cause this?

Maybe for some reason the time stamp on the repository is greater than the
time stamp listed in CVS/Entries or it got munged some how?  Though I
thought it went by revision number anyway, so that doesn't make sense.

       Mike Castle       Life is like a clock:  You can work constantly
  address@hidden  and be right all the time, or not work at all and be right at least twice a day.  -- mrc
    We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan.  -- Watchmen

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]