Re: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?

[Nicholas Jankowski]

On Jan 2, 2017 6:46 AM, "Julien Bect" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Le 02/01/2017 à 10:34, Julien Bect a écrit :
>>
>> Le 01/01/2017 à 22:42, Julien Bect a écrit :
>>>
>>> Le 01/01/2017 à 20:48, siko1056 a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan Suever wrote
>>>>>
>>>>> It's worth noting that the OP was using the second example on the online
>>>>> documentation
>>>>> &lt;https://octave.sourceforge.io/octave/function/datetick.html&gt;
>>>>> as a guide which also incorrectly transposes the first two inputs. I have
>>>>> submitted a bug report to the bug tracker
>>>>> &lt;https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49954&gt;.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm more than happy to help fix this documentation error if someone can
>>>>> point me towards the best way to contribute changes towards the online
>>>>> documentation.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Jonathan
>>>>
>>>> As explained in the bug tracker [1] the change of the online documentation
>>>> [2] (actually it is a documentation maintained by Octave forge, the official
>>>> Octave documentation for the latest release is found at [3]) depends on a
>>>> page update by Carnë.
>>>
>>>
>>> Kai,
>>>
>>> I have just checked: I have r/w access on these pages (but perhaps all OF developpers have ?).
>>>
>>> Generating the documentation should be as simple as a call to generate_html_manual... (@Carnë: is there anything else to do ?).
>>
>>
>> I should never have said "simple"...
>
>
> Ok, I have managed to produce a documentation and pushed it online:
>
> https://octave.sourceforge.io/octave/overview.html
>
> Tell me if there is anything wrong with it.  The old documentation is still available here:
>
> https://octave.sourceforge.io/octave.old/overview.html
>
> just in case.  @++
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-octave
>

Should the "see also"s in there be links?