help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?


From: Julien Bect
Subject: Re: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:45:44 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.4.0

Le 02/01/2017 à 10:34, Julien Bect a écrit :
Le 01/01/2017 à 22:42, Julien Bect a écrit :
Le 01/01/2017 à 20:48, siko1056 a écrit :
Jonathan Suever wrote
It's worth noting that the OP was using the second example on the online
documentation
<https://octave.sourceforge.io/octave/function/datetick.html>
as a guide which also incorrectly transposes the first two inputs. I have
submitted a bug report to the bug tracker
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49954>.

I'm more than happy to help fix this documentation error if someone can
point me towards the best way to contribute changes towards the online
documentation.

-Jonathan
As explained in the bug tracker [1] the change of the online documentation
[2] (actually it is a documentation maintained by Octave forge, the official
Octave documentation for the latest release is found at [3]) depends on a
page update by Carnë.

Kai,

I have just checked: I have r/w access on these pages (but perhaps all OF developpers have ?).

Generating the documentation should be as simple as a call to generate_html_manual... (@Carnë: is there anything else to do ?).

I should never have said "simple"...

Ok, I have managed to produce a documentation and pushed it online:

https://octave.sourceforge.io/octave/overview.html

Tell me if there is anything wrong with it.  The old documentation is still available here:

https://octave.sourceforge.io/octave.old/overview.html

just in case.  @++


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]