[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave and databases
From: |
Martin Helm |
Subject: |
Re: Octave and databases |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:14:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.31.12-0.2-desktop; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Mittwoch, 1. September 2010, 15:56:26 schrieben Sie:
> Martin Helm wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 1. September 2010, 08:51:57 schrieb Pohlen, Timo:
> >
> >
> > maintained and it works. Java is very strong and easy for database
> > handling.
> >
> > ^^^^
>
> And heavy and computing-intensive.
>
> Pascal
Not at all, database access via java is as performant as access via native
libraries. I work now with jdbc for 6 years (and before worked with database
access from c++ via the native lib's to sybase and oracle. postgres) in my
job, and can clearly not see any difference in performance or cpu load.
Internally both use essentially the same technology, both are usually heavily
optimized by the database vendors (be it FOSS like postgres or proprietary).
- Martin
- Octave and databases, Pohlen, Timo, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, Andy Buckle, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, CdeMills, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, Martin Helm, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, CdeMills, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases,
Martin Helm <=
- Re: Octave and databases, fork, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, Martin Helm, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, fork, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, David Grundberg, 2010/09/01
- Re: Octave and databases, Søren Hauberg, 2010/09/02
- Swig works (Re: Octave and databases), David Grundberg, 2010/09/08
- Re: Swig works (Re: Octave and databases), Xavier Delacour, 2010/09/08
- Re: Swig works (Re: Octave and databases), David Grundberg, 2010/09/08
- Re: Swig works (Re: Octave and databases), Xavier Delacour, 2010/09/08
- Re: Swig works (Re: Octave and databases), Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/09/08