[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?
From: |
Boris Kolpackov |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in $(call ...) ? |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 12:05:35 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> writes:
> I didn't say I disagreed,
I guess it was the other discussion where you disagreed ;-)
> I said that any change to the expansion rules, even for just
> one function, needs to be carefully examined.
True. My original suggestion (to temporarily change simple mode
to recursive mode inside func_call() ) won't work for the following
case:
x := $$2
a := $$1 $$x
b := $(call a,foo,bar)
I guess adding a flag to variable_expand_string() would do the trick
but this is a more extensive change.
-boris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, (continued)
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Alexey Neyman, 2004/12/20
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Boris Kolpackov, 2004/12/20
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Paul D. Smith, 2004/12/20
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Alexey Neyman, 2004/12/21
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Boris Kolpackov, 2004/12/21
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Paul D. Smith, 2004/12/21
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?,
Boris Kolpackov <=
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Paul D. Smith, 2004/12/24