[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why do we need a number of different terminal modes in Emacs?
From: |
Robert Thorpe |
Subject: |
Re: Why do we need a number of different terminal modes in Emacs? |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:16:40 +0000 |
Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes:
...
> ls -> dired
> make -> M-x compile
> grep -> M-x grep
>
> these commands offer advantages over a shell buffer.
> Years ago I used to use M-x shell, but I no longer find use for any of
> these shell interfaces.
Yes. I only use Emac's shell modes for programs that can't be dealt
with by a specific mode. For 90% of cases I get away without using them
at all, when I need them I use M-x term.
BR,
Robert Thorpe
Re: Why do we need a number of different terminal modes in Emacs?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/02/01
Re: Why do we need a number of different terminal modes in Emacs?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/02/01