[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs
From: |
Yuri Khan |
Subject: |
Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:08:14 +0700 |
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:37 PM, <saint@eng.it> wrote:
> Can you change the colors in nano?
Can. But it lacks indirection layers.
=== /usr/share/nano/debian.nanorc ===
syntax "apt/sources.list" "sources\.list(\.old|~)?$"
# component
color brightmagenta "^deb(-src)? ((http|file|ftp):/[^
]+|cdrom:\[[^\]]+\]/|cdrom:\[[-a-zA-Z0-9\._\(\) ]+\]/) [^ ]+ .+$"
# distribution
color brightred "^deb(-src)? ((http|file|ftp):/[^
]+|cdrom:\[[^\]]+\]/|cdrom:\[[-a-zA-Z0-9\._\(\) ]+\]/) [^ ]+"
# URI
color brightgreen "(http|file|ftp):/[^ ]+"
[…]
===
So one does not simply change one face and get e.g. all keywords
recolored; instead, one has to copy all the relevant configs and edit
them for each language.
- evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/15
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/15
- Message not available
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, H. Dieter Wilhelm, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs, Dan Espen, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs, Dan Espen, 2014/11/17
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/17
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, saint, 2014/11/17
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs,
Yuri Khan <=
- Message not available
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/17