[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RTF for emacs
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: RTF for emacs |
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 2014 01:32:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Sharon Kimble <boudiccas@skimble.plus.com> writes:
> I'm re-writing a book that I published over ten years
> ago, and in the intervening period I've lost the
> sources, so I'm essentially starting from scratch
> again. I started doing it in org-mode, and have since
> converted it to latex
Yeah, good point. If you write a book you are probably
very focused to get every detail exactly as you want
it, because it is such an ambitious project. I always
said if writers learned LaTeX the whole publishing
industry would go to hell. And that would be a good
thing, but I don't think the writers will do us that
favour anytime soon.
--
underground experts united:
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: From: Sharon Kimble, Subject: Re: editor and word processor history, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/29
- Re: RTF for emacs, Rusi, 2014/05/29
- Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/29
- Re: RTF for emacs, James Freer, 2014/05/29
Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/25
Message not availableRe: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/26
Re: RTF for emacs, Charles Philip Chan, 2014/05/25
Re: RTF for emacs, Robert Thorpe, 2014/05/25
Re: RTF for emacs, Charles Philip Chan, 2014/05/25
Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/26
Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/26
Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/26