[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alt vs Meta - Sun keyboard, redhat linux
From: |
Peter Dyballa |
Subject: |
Re: Alt vs Meta - Sun keyboard, redhat linux |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 01:24:35 +0100 |
Am 05.01.2011 um 00:17 schrieb chengiz:
There is no difference with -Q, it still interprets Alt as Meta.
Are you going to change the sequence of the modifier definitions? (You
don't need to restart GNU Emacs, it will receive the new changed key
events.)
Mine is sparse:
shift Shift_L (0x40), Shift_R (0x44)
lock Caps_Lock (0x41)
control Control_L (0x43), Control_R (0x46)
mod1
mod2 Meta_L (0x3f), Meta_R (0x47)
mod3
mod4
mod5
...not a desktop computer!
--
Greetings
Pete
To drink without thirst and to make love all the time, madam, it is
only these which distinguish us from the other beasts.
– Beaumarchais
- Alt vs Meta - Sun keyboard, redhat linux, chengiz, 2011/01/01
- Re: Alt vs Meta - Sun keyboard, redhat linux, Peter Dyballa, 2011/01/01
- Message not available
- Re: Alt vs Meta - Sun keyboard, redhat linux, chengiz, 2011/01/03
- Re: Alt vs Meta - Sun keyboard, redhat linux, Peter Dyballa, 2011/01/03
- Message not available
- Re: Alt vs Meta - Sun keyboard, redhat linux, chengiz, 2011/01/04
- Re: Alt vs Meta - Sun keyboard, redhat linux, Peter Dyballa, 2011/01/04
- Message not available
- Re: Alt vs Meta - Sun keyboard, redhat linux, chengiz, 2011/01/04
- Re: Alt vs Meta - Sun keyboard, redhat linux,
Peter Dyballa <=