[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs for everything?
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: emacs for everything? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:50:44 +0000 |
User-agent: |
tin/1.4.5-20010409 ("One More Nightmare") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.35 (i686)) |
Joe Corneli <jcorneli@math.utexas.edu> wrote on Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:24:57
-0600:
> What _you_ are missing on X is the benefit of having Emacs
> occupying the _whole_ screen with an optimal font, without
> distractions from window borders, mice, scroll-bars, menus,
> task-bars, wine-bars, tool-bars, crow-bars, and what ever else
> glaziers clutter your screen up with.
> He might be but _I'm_ not -- check out the ratpoison window manager.
> (And if you like my posted emacs configuration, which gets rid of
> all the googahs you mentioned.)
Heh! I use ratpoison for running a web browser in, and occasionally for
reading files.pdf (YUCK!).
> As for why I prefer to use X, it is because there are more modifiers
> available in an emacs running under X than in an emacs running in
> the terminal.
You mean, key-modifiers like C-M-<right>, right? I've got all those on
the console, too.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Munich, Germany)
Email: aacm@muuc.dee; to decode, wherever there is a repeated letter
(like "aa"), remove half of them (leaving, say, "a").
- Re: emacs for everything?, (continued)
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Micha Feigin, 2004/11/28
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/28
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/27
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, David Hansen, 2004/11/28
- dual head video system (was Re: emacs for everything?), ken, 2004/11/30
- Message not available
- Re: dual head video system, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/30
- Re: emacs for everything?, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/11/18
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: emacs for everything?, Joe Corneli, 2004/11/17
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/11/18
- Re: emacs for everything?, Joe Corneli, 2004/11/18