[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: simple editor required
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: simple editor required |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:48:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Paul Edwards" <kerravon@nosppaam.w3.to> writes:
> I don't need syntax highlighting, what I need is indent to work
> logically. Is cc's indenting more logical?
My thinking was if you have the choice between two modes that don't
behave logically, you might prefer the one which at least does syntax
highlighting ;-)
You could configure C mode in a similar way, like text mode. So you
can get the now-found logical behavior and also syntax highlighting.
--
~/.signature
- Re: simple editor required, (continued)
- Re: simple editor required, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/23
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/23
- Re: simple editor required, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/24
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/24
- Re: simple editor required, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/24
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/24
- Re: simple editor required, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/24
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/25
- Re: simple editor required, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/25
- Message not available
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/25
- Re: simple editor required,
Kai Großjohann <=
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/30
- Re: simple editor required, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/20
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/23
- Re: simple editor required, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/23
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/23
- Re: simple editor required, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/24
- Re: simple editor required, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/17
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/18
- Re: simple editor required, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/19
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/17