Re: Bison Version Compatibility

[Matt Cupp]

I've never used Bison++/Flex++, so I'm no use there.

The C files are completely compatible with C++ and I've found unless
you need multiple concurrent instances or thread safe, they work just
fine.  I just have my output files name with a .cpp and .hpp
extensions.

Hope that helps...
Matt

On 8/1/07, Camille Caceres <address@hidden> wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I've downloaded Bison 2.3, and Flex 2.5.4 seems to install fine although I
> still have some problems compiling. Can you answer my question about
> Bison++/Flex++? I'd like to know if I should use those since I want to
> produce C++ files.
>
>
> On 8/1/07, Matt Cupp <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I've used both 2.1 and 2.3 versions to create code I compile with
> > Visual Studio .NET 2005 and gcc on Linux.  I would assume that it
> > should compile fine on 2003 as well.  The GNU for Windows project
> > hasn't updated their Bison to 2.3, but if you download Cygwin you can
> > select Bison 2.3 and Flex 2.5.4 to be installed.
> >
> > Matt Cupp
> >
> >
> > On 8/1/07, Camille Caceres <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Hello, I hope someone can help me with some information. I am using
> > > Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003. Is there a specific version of Bison
> that
> > > is compatible with this? I think Bison 2.1 is the latest version but I'm
> not
> > > sure. I would also like to know what version of Flex I should be using.
> I
> > > want to produce C++ files, should I be using Bison++/Flex++ instead?