guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [v3 1/2] gnu: w3m: Update patch to use '-p1'.


From: Leo Famulari
Subject: Re: [v3 1/2] gnu: w3m: Update patch to use '-p1'.
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 02:30:02 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:33:28AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
> 
> > * gnu/packages/patches/w3m-fix-compile.patch: Update to work with -p1.
> > * gnu/packages/w3m.scm (w3m): Drop patch flag -p0.
> 
> I would rename the patch to, say, ‘w3m-libgc.patch’, for clarity.
> 
> > --- a/gnu/packages/patches/w3m-fix-compile.patch
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/w3m-fix-compile.patch
> > @@ -1,15 +1,27 @@
> > +From 371f256f5f300b01be228a6fd95884ea475965fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > +From: Leo Famulari <address@hidden>
> > +Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:57:29 -0500
> > +Subject: [PATCH 1/4] fix compile
> > +
> >  https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33397
> 
> Could you remove the Git header and write something like:
> 
>   This patch fixes w3m compilation with libgc > X.Y.
> 
> (If I understand correctly what it does.)

Done.

> 
> However, I’m surprised this is needed since libgc hasn’t changed lately?

It's for libgc-7.2, released 2012-05-11.

You may also notice the substitution of "file_handle" in w3m's package
definition. That's because glibc decided to start using the identifier
"file_handle" in 2011 [0]. The problem was reported to w3m on the last
day of 2011 [1]. It was patched in the distros in 2012 but nothing from
upstream.

[0]
http://repo.or.cz/w/glibc.git/commitdiff/158648c0bdda281e252a27c0200dd0ea6f4e0215

[1]
http://sourceforge.net/p/w3m/patches/58/

> 
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]