[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0
From: |
Per Bothner |
Subject: |
Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:06:05 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 |
This is nice. It would be great if the Guile port would be merged
into the reference implementation, presumably using cond-expand.
That way bug-fixes or changes in one could be more easily be
merged into the other.
The use of #:KEYWORD syntax might cause reader problems on some
Scheme implementations, even when using cond-expand, though not on Kawa.
One option is for the Guile port to contain the define-module in a
separate file, which does an include on (a suitably enhanced)
version of the portable implementation. (I assume Guild has
include or something similar.)
--
--Per Bothner
address@hidden http://per.bothner.com/
- SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0, Sunjoong Lee, 2012/04/13
- Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0, Sunjoong Lee, 2012/04/13
- Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0,
Per Bothner <=
- Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0, Sunjoong Lee, 2012/04/14
- Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0, Sunjoong Lee, 2012/04/15
- Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0, Noah Lavine, 2012/04/19
- Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0, Per Bothner, 2012/04/20
- Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0, Sunjoong Lee, 2012/04/20
- Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0, Per Bothner, 2012/04/20
- Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0, Sunjoong Lee, 2012/04/20
- Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/04/20
- Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0, Sunjoong Lee, 2012/04/20
- Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/04/21