Re: [g-wrap] Changes needed by the "glueless" approach

[Rob Browning]

Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:

> [CCing Rob, as I don't know if he's on the new list already]

Actually I'm not yet (so please cc me), but I'm about ready to try and
answer a number of messages (including yours) that have been pending
for a while, and also expound on some (possibly wrong-headed) ideas so
others can help me tell whether or not they have any merit.

...but *before* I do that, I wanted to figure out *where* I should do
that.  It seems like a separate g-wrap list might be the best idea,
but then again, it'd be nice not to have to administer a new list, and
it may well be that guile-gtk is (and will be) the primary customer
for now.

Thoughts?
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592  F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4