[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, wip-1-8-mingw-build, updated. rele
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, wip-1-8-mingw-build, updated. release_1-8-7-22-g7edad77 |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:37:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
() Andy Wingo <address@hidden>
() Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:07:24 +0100
On Fri 26 Mar 2010 01:31, Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> Is there a nice way of marking a branch as obsolete/historical, or of
> adding an explanatory note to it?
I don't know. It would only be for purposes of gitweb/cgit, I don't
think git has this concept.
Perhaps "git tag" with some kind of conventional prefix? E.g.,
$ { date -u +"%F %T UTC" ; echo ; } > TMP
$ cat >>TMP <<EOF
This branch is live|dead|zombified|historic|pickled|putrescent|etc.
We keep it around because <explanation>.
If you delete it, someone might complain.
If you add to it, you probably are confused.
EOF
$ git tag -F TMP BRANCH-NAME-nb
This way one can easily ignore *-nb tags. Using a suffix ensures
that the tag hierarchy mirrors the branch hierarchy (if any).
thi
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, wip-1-8-mingw-build, updated. release_1-8-7-22-g7edad77, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/03/06
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, wip-1-8-mingw-build, updated. release_1-8-7-22-g7edad77, Neil Jerram, 2010/03/07
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, wip-1-8-mingw-build, updated. release_1-8-7-22-g7edad77, Neil Jerram, 2010/03/25
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, wip-1-8-mingw-build, updated. release_1-8-7-22-g7edad77, Andy Wingo, 2010/03/26
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, wip-1-8-mingw-build, updated. release_1-8-7-22-g7edad77,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, wip-1-8-mingw-build, updated. release_1-8-7-22-g7edad77, Neil Jerram, 2010/03/26
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, wip-1-8-mingw-build, updated. release_1-8-7-22-g7edad77, Neil Jerram, 2010/03/26