Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated

[Rob Browning]

stefan <address@hidden> writes:

> Which compiler can parse this ? I would be happy if any...

You're absolutely right.  I wasn't thinking.

> That is why I considered the long_long and ulong_long typedef a good
> thing. It would solve the problem.

Yep.  Without the typedef, you're somewhat stuck.  Also note that in
reference to a previous comment, at least according to C9X, __int64 is
an acceptable substitution since long long is just guaranteed >= 64
bits.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD