[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCM_CALL_N
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: SCM_CALL_N |
Date: |
22 Jun 2001 13:01:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>>>> "Keisuke" == Keisuke Nishida <address@hidden> writes:
Keisuke> Hello, The patch attached below implements four macros,
Keisuke> SCM_CALL_0, SCM_CALL_1, SCM_CALL_2, and SCM_CALL_3, as
Keisuke> follows: [...]
Keisuke> Is this a good patch? Can I apply it?
I'm inclined against it. The benefit does not seem sufficient to
outweigh the cost, which is to obscure calls of scm_apply.
Instead, some of the cases that you suggest changing could be tidied
up a bit by using the appropriate SCM_LISTn macro.
Neil
- SCM_CALL_N, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/06/22
- Re: SCM_CALL_N,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: SCM_CALL_N, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/06/22
- Re: SCM_CALL_N, Dale P. Smith, 2001/06/22
- Re: SCM_CALL_N, Neil Jerram, 2001/06/24
- Re: SCM_CALL_N, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/06/24
- Re: SCM_CALL_N, Neil Jerram, 2001/06/24
- Re: SCM_CALL_N, Rob Browning, 2001/06/24
- Re: SCM_CALL_N, Neil Jerram, 2001/06/24
- Re: SCM_CALL_N, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/06/25
- Re: SCM_CALL_N, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/25
- Re: SCM_CALL_N, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/25