guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SCM_CALL_N


From: Dirk Herrmann
Subject: Re: SCM_CALL_N
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:49:23 +0200 (MEST)

On 22 Jun 2001, Neil Jerram wrote:

> >>>>> "Keisuke" == Keisuke Nishida <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>     Keisuke> Hello, The patch attached below implements four macros,
>     Keisuke> SCM_CALL_0, SCM_CALL_1, SCM_CALL_2, and SCM_CALL_3, as
>     Keisuke> follows: [...]
> 
>     Keisuke> Is this a good patch?  Can I apply it?
> 
> I'm inclined against it.  The benefit does not seem sufficient to
> outweigh the cost, which is to obscure calls of scm_apply.
> 
> Instead, some of the cases that you suggest changing could be tidied
> up a bit by using the appropriate SCM_LISTn macro.

But, I have always had problems to understand the way parameters have to
be passed to scm_apply.  Therefore, I think Keisuke does bring up a point
which could actually need improvement.

Best regards,
Dirk Herrmann




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]