[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>
From: |
Martin Grabmueller |
Subject: |
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :> |
Date: |
Mon, 28 May 2001 16:36:47 +0200 (MEST) |
> From: Rob Browning <address@hidden>
> Date: 26 May 2001 20:32:08 -0500
>
> Any thoughts? I'd really like as simple a set of processing rules as
> possible for both command line and meta args that still preserves the
> flexibility we need to allow things like -c and -x to be used as meta
> args with clear quoting semantics.
I would like to see the `parse with read, deliver string list' approach.
Regards,
'martin
- Command line processing opens up can of worms :>, Rob Browning, 2001/05/26
- Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/27
- Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>, Rob Browning, 2001/05/27
- Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/29
- Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>, Rob Browning, 2001/05/29
- Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/29
- Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>, Rob Browning, 2001/05/29
- Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/30
- Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/29
- Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/29
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>,
Martin Grabmueller <=